“I understand that you have been copied into an email from a junior member of the UKCTCS which was circulated to the UKCTCS list encouraging sign up to the various websites supporting plain packs stating, ‘You can only vote once on each petition, but I would seriously doubt that there will be cross checking between charity petitions so it may be worth signing all of them to get your money’s worth!"In other words, if all anti tobacco warriors sign every petition available, no matter how many times they sign for the same result, there is absolutely no way that those idiots (err...the general public) will have an earthly of defeating the proposal: we win again. Simples!
So blase are these obnoxious, pleasure deny-ers on Shoreditch High Street that they only remonstrate about such a practise when the race is over and done with. The Commentator leads with "Corruption behind the government’s public consultation on standardised packaging of tobacco products"and they nail Arnott fairly & squarely to the mast-as should be done! Lansley has fallen on his sword of tobacco revulsion, so has Milton and Arnott should follow!
Again, just so that it sinks into the feeble minded smoker haters on this planet: Soooooo my last status m signing off can’t tolerate life any more byeeeeee every 1.....!!!!!!"" Soooooo my last status m signing off can’t tolerate life any more byeeeeee every 1.....!!!!!!"
'Harsh' then went 'skydiving' from a 4th floor window and immediately met his death. His death has been recorded as suicide yet what was the actual cause of death? Answer, quite simply, interfering busybodies who take other peoples pleasures far too seriously. The teacher should be charged with 'causing death by dangerous mouthing'; ie manslaughter. Any qualms about such an event Debs or is it just another acceptable part of your evil manipulations?
In another bizarre twist and from all the propaganda issued over the past half decade, Pfizer have suddenly decided to make an 'out of court settlement' with the wife of a Minnesota man who died after taking this 'smoking curative'.
Oh you can bet your sweet ass “Terms are confidential.”! They certainly won't want to disclose how much it has cost them to keep the case (and chantix) out of court! And why do they want to keep it out of court? Because they know that by losing in court the open the floodgates of financial purgatory! After all they have only just had the time to come to terms with a $60m fine for a decade of bribery & corruption. About the same time they have been plying British anti smoking organisations with money! January sees the next legal round in America.“We can confirm that we have settled this case,” Chris Loder, a Pfizer spokesman, said in an e-mailed statement today. “Terms are confidential.”
As the lies, fabrications, manipulated statistics & junk science are becoming looser than a whores draws on payday it is highly amusing that the anti tobacco mob released this little gem:
"Brussels police have swept the offices of two major public health organisations for bugs following a break-in at a building in the rue de Tréves in which laptops and documents relating to their battles against the tobacco industry were stolen."Now they must be worried about what
She states :
'You did nothing to address inequality by giving yourself the right to spoil the enjoyment of others. In doing so you acted without regard for equality and contrary to the meaning of it. You made your decision to sabotage the race based on the membership or perceived membership of its participants to which you took exception. That is prejudice. No good ever comes from prejudice. It is a necessary part of a liberal and tolerant society that no one should be targeted because of a characteristic with which another takes issue. Prejudice in any form is wrong.'Thank you Judge Anne Molyneu, you have just shot the entire anti smoking lobby up the arse and made the case for separate smoking rooms, ventilation and the rights for licencees to choose for themselves!
Prejudice in any form is wrong.
Prejudice in any form is wrong.
Prejudice in any form is wrong.
Therefore, in the eyes of the law this prejudice against smokers is also wrong, severely wrong and must be righted-and the means to right this terrible wrong are seemingly simple: ventilation & separate rooms! And when this is suitably done, all ex-licensees, all those ex-club owners and all those forced out o0f business and onto the 'dole queues' thanks to the most unlawful law ever passed should line up and sue this government for they had their chance to amend the ban as soon as they got into power.naive as to assume that no smokers voted for the promise of law reforms!
So you see folks, the house of cards is falling, the builders of the house should be facing prison sentences, the perpetrators of this despicable crime against humanity should be publicly flogged, then hung out to dry for they have created Lord only knows what pain & suffering, homelessness & hardship, anguish & stress to millions of people. Health??? it was never about health for the simple reason that nothing could be proven that SHS caused 11,000 deaths per annum (
Well done Phil! Nice overview of their current (current? more like "normal") mess. Hadn't heard about the break in thing -- interesting. Sweeping for bugs? Sheeesh!
ReplyDelete- MJM
The Uk smoking ban continues to ruin the social lives of millions of people that have stopped using pubs now that non smokers only are accommodated inside. It means many smokers find themselves excluded from society, persecuted and discriminated against as a direct consequence of the ban. With smoking being legal and governments making billions in taxes, shouldn't smokers have as much a right to a place to socialise in as non smokers ?
ReplyDeleteScientific studies that don't stand up to scrutiny, are the only things keeping the ban in place and the DOH dictating peoples social lives.
What will it take to bring about change and amendments to the indoor smoking ban, giving people back their much needed freedom to socialise again ?
I am a doctor of respiratory medicine and sadly was misled about the harms of 2nd hand smoke. recently i have looked into this issue and found no evidence whatsoever and or had to treat a patients for passive smoking related issues. sadly again bad and junk research is causing a lot of harm to genuine and good methodology in the research world as a whole and organizations such as ASH should be closed down for the lies and contribution to the lies, propaganda and deceit. i don't support smoking as first handing smoking can cause a lot of disease and distress for patients, but to say that none smokers are at risk of diseases related to SHS makes a mockery out of good un biased research and as such anything less then that should be treated with serious consequences. Dr R Woods. London. UK
ReplyDelete